Showing posts with label medical malpractice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical malpractice. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Medical Malpractice Filed against Dental Health Practitioners after a Teenager’s Death

Having an aching wisdom tooth is really bothering. It prevents you to sleep soundly during the night. It prohibits you to eat or chew properly. It can even disturb you mentally. An affected person may even consider having a tooth extraction and forget about the fear associated with it just to get rid of the severe, lingering pain.

However, would you still consider a wisdom tooth removal after hearing this piece of news about a teenager who died days after his tooth extraction?

A teenager named Jennifer Michelle Olenick from Woodstock, Maryland died ten days after having her wisdom tooth removed.

Though the anesthesiologist, oral surgeon and three other dental practitioners performed the standard operating procedure during the oral surgery, they failed to resuscitate Olenick after her heartbeat dropped and became negligent when the teenager’s body started to lose oxygen.

Olenick was rushed to Howard County General Hospital and then transferred to John Hopkins Hospital for a more specialized care. However, despite being on advanced life support, Olenick died ten days after being in a comatose stage.

Investigations found out that Olenick’s primary cause of death was hypoxia, which usually occurs when the brain lacks of oxygen and has been known to take place when complications arise from the administered general anesthesia.

According to Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation President Robert Stoeling, if the patient is administered with anesthesia, the patient’s breathing and oxygenation should be continuously monitored through the use of proper medical equipments to determine the development of hypoxia before it causes cardiac arrest.

This was what Olenick’s attending surgeons and dental practitioners probably missed during her oral surgery. Now, they are facing a medical malpractice lawsuit filed by Olenick’s parents after learning the real cause of death of their daughter.

Dr. Krista Michelle Isaacs, the anesthesiologist, Dr. Dominick Coletti, the oral surgeon, the Central Maryland Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery PA and the Baltimore Washington Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Center LLC were named in the lawsuit with alleged claim of more than $30,000.

Now, would you still consider wisdom tooth removal or just endure its nerve-racking pain?

In Olenick’s case, the medical malpractice committed is due to the mental health practitioners’ absentmindedness during the operation and failure to provide necessary medical equipments. Now, they are not only to pay for their negligence but they also ruined their long-established career.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Medical Malpractice Case, Filed for Wrong Prescription of - Christianity?

Christianity – with a generic name of “anointed one” is a religion based on Jesus’ teachings and life as illustrated in Gospels and other New Testaments. Followers of Christian faith are known as Christians.

Oops, wait. Apparently, definition of Christianity doesn’t relate into a drug or a medicine. It’s definitely a religion. How come a British doctor has been prescribing Christianity to his patients?

Dr. Richard Scott is now under investigation for wrongful prescription of religion and not medicine. Allegedly, he was promoting Christianity as a health benefit to his 24-year-old depressed patient.

According to the British medical guidelines, medical malpractice is not allowed. Doctor’s personal belief should not be discussed to patients if it is far relevant to the patient’s medical care needs.

Another point is that Scott’s patient is suffering from depression regarding his lifestyle issues. It is also stated in the General Medical Council of UK that doctors must not express their personal beliefs like political, religious and others in such ways that may exploit their patient’s sensitivity or that may possibly cause them further distress.

This case is about Scott and his colleagues, directly offering God as part of his usual treatment. It’s not a case about a doctor who once mentioned his religious belief during a consultation.

The main reason why the medical litigation occurs is because Scott declines the GMS’s decision to reprimand him over the incident. He was insisting that he has the right to offer the word of God to his patients.

Well, obviously this case still doesn’t qualify to a medical malpractice. It is still under debate and expected to prolong. Based on the doctor’s act, this case is more like a religious discrimination rather than a medical malpractice.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Woman Who Underwent Mastectomies Received $198,000 for Medical Malpractice

Mastectomy is the medical term for removal of one or both breast though a surgical operation. Removal could either be partially or completely. It is usually done to treat breast cancer. Cancer cells are being removed from the breast in this procedure.

Generally, mastectomy is advisable for patients with cancer or with a high risk of cancer only. And this had led a woman from California to file for a medical malpractice lawsuit against a Los Angeles county hospital.

Ana Jimenez – Salgado filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against a hospital in Los Angeles where she had her mastectomy after she found out that she never had a breast cancer.

Jimenez – Salgado underwent a mastectomy on 2007 after she learned from an outside pathologist that the cells obtained from her biopsy were cancerous. She only found out that she never had breast cancer when she later underwent a reconstructive surgery after the hospital’s pathologists concluded that she never had such illness. 

In the lawsuit, Jimenez Salgado claimed that the hospital has been negligent in relying on the outside pathologists and that her reconstruction was carelessly performed. The county hospital admitted that they failed to review her biopsy specimen before heading on her mastectomy.

The said medical malpractice lawsuit had awarded her a $198,000. That’s a somewhat good consolation for losing her breast. She may now have her prefect reconstructive surgery now using her medical malpractice compensation.

Hopefully, the county hospital learned their lesson from this personal injury case to prevent such mistakes from happening again.